// PIMS® data

What drives business performance, measured.

PIMS® links the market position, operations, and cost and capital structure of more than 4,300 business units to their financial results. The data comes from confidential management accounts, collected since 1967 and never published.

// what each record links

Competitive position
Market environment
Value chain and operations
Cost and capital structure
↓
Performance outcomes: profitability and growth

For the same business unit, over 3 to 12 years.

4,300+
business units, each tracked for 3 to 12 years
25,000+
business-years of panel data
12,600+
observations (3-year snapshots)
~500
variables per business unit
1967–2026
years covered, with contributions continuing
95.6%
complete across 6.1 million data fields

// why the data is different

Recorded where decisions are made, and followed over time.

Most business data comes from surveys, public filings or market snapshots. PIMS records the internal metrics of individual business units, taken from their management accounts, and follows each unit for several years.

At business-unit level

Each strategic business unit (SBU) has its own market, competitors and customers. Group accounts blend several businesses and hide the choices that drive each one. PIMS records market share, relative quality, pricing, innovation, cost and capital where they are decided.

Followed over time

Each business unit is observed for at least three years, five on average. Analysts can compare the same business before and after a change: what it changed, and how its profitability and growth moved afterwards.

Comparable across industries and decades

Every variable has a maintained definition, formula and collection protocol. A business measured in 1985 can be compared with one measured in 2025, and an industrial supplier with a consumer brand.

Not available anywhere else

The data comes from confidential management accounts, collected with each contributing business at the time. It has never been published, is not part of any AI training dataset to date, and cannot be reconstructed from public sources. No other source we know of records relative market share, relative quality and financial results for the same business units over time, across industries.

// what the data covers

What's in the data

Around 500 variables per business unit, in five groups.

Competitive position
Market share, relative quality, relative price, customer value
Market environment
Market growth and structure, customers and competitors
Value chain and operations
Vertical integration, productivity, capacity use
Cost and capital structure
Cost structure, investment intensity, capital allocation
Performance outcomes
Profitability and growth

Business units by industry group

Components for finished products
878
Consumer non-durables
784
Supplies and consumables
687
Raw or semi-finished materials
602
Capital goods
556
Consumer durables
453
Retail, digital and services
359
Unit of observation
Strategic business unit (SBU)
Panel
25,000+ business-years; each unit tracked for 3 to 12 years (average 5); units join at different times
Observations
12,600+ three-year snapshots
Geography
North America, Europe and Asia
Period
1967–2026
Completeness
95.6% of 6.1 million data fields

Coverage notes

PIMS began at General Electric, so North American, manufacturing-intensive businesses from before 2000 are the most heavily represented. Coverage also spans Europe and Asia, and includes 359 retail, digital and services businesses. No unit spans the full period. Pre-revenue and very early-stage businesses are excluded: without a stable operating history, their figures are not comparable.

// what the data shows

Findings that have held across industries and decades

PIMS research has been published since the 1970s. Three of its best-known findings:

Relative quality pays

Businesses whose customers rate their offering above competitors' earn higher returns, on average, than those rated below.

Relative market share matters

Market share relative to the largest competitors is strongly associated with profitability.

Heavy investment depresses returns

Businesses with high investment relative to sales tend to earn lower returns on investment, unless productivity and market position offset it.

Source: Buzzell & Gale (1987), The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance, Free Press. More findings: Nine Basic Findings on Business Strategy.

// models

Models built on the data

Profit Potential Analysis (PAR®)

up to 75%
of variation in long-term profitability explained
15
structural factors
~4 yrs
to close half the gap to PAR

Estimates the return on sales a business can sustain, from 15 structural factors covering competitive position, market environment, and cost and capital structure. Because they are leading indicators, not accounting components of profit, PAR is a prediction rather than a reconstruction.

Strategic Peer Analysis

Finds structurally comparable businesses in the database and compares the stronger and weaker performers among them, to show which differences account for the gap.

Cause-Effect Model

Maps the direction, size and order of the links between strategic variables and outcomes.

See how companies use these models

// who it is for

Who works with PIMS data

AI LABS AND MODEL BUILDERS

Test and ground business reasoning

Check whether a model's judgements on strategy and performance match what happened to thousands of real businesses. Use PIMS to evaluate, calibrate and ground models and enterprise agents, or as fine-tuning data.

Discuss access options

STRATEGY AND ADVISORY FIRMS

Evidence from comparable businesses

Set targets and test recommendations against the outcomes of structurally comparable businesses, not case studies.

Discuss a licence or partnership

INVESTORS AND PRIVATE EQUITY

Profit potential beyond historical financials

Compare a company's actual return with its PAR. Below PAR can indicate unrealised potential; above PAR, a likely decline towards it. Apply it in due diligence or across a portfolio.

Talk to our team

ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS

A documented panel with a published record

Business-unit panel data with maintained variable definitions, used in research published in Harvard Business Review, Strategic Management Journal and Journal of Marketing.

Enquire about research access

Want to benchmark your own business? See Strategic Benchmarking

// access

Ways to work with the data

Every arrangement is shaped around how the data will be used, and agreed under licence. Typical arrangements include:

Research licence. Anonymised extracts for defined research questions.

Benchmarks and model outputs. Aggregated benchmarks and model results for your own analysis or products.

Analysis within our environment. We run the analysis for you, or you work in an environment we control, so record-level data stays with us.

Partnership. Joint research or products built on the data.

Tell us what you want to do with the data, and we will set out the options.

Discuss access options

// governance

How the data is handled

Anonymised
No contributing company or business unit can be identified.
From management accounts
Contributed under confidentiality by the businesses themselves.
Documented
Each variable has a maintained definition, formula and collection protocol. A data dictionary is available under NDA.
Controlled
Record-level data has never been published or shared, and is not part of any AI training dataset to date. Use is governed by licence.

// about

Six decades of research

PIMS® (Profit Impact of Market Strategy) began at General Electric in the 1960s as a study of what drives business success. In the 1970s it became a multi-company programme, led by Harvard Business School among others, and was later run by the Strategic Planning Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Publicly known participants include Siemens, Nestlé and P&G.

Its findings have been published in Harvard Business Review, Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Marketing and Long Range Planning, and summarised in The PIMS Principles (Buzzell & Gale, 1987).

pims.ai | malik maintains and extends the database. Headquartered in London, with offices in St Gallen and Beijing, it applies statistics and machine learning to the data, and combines PIMS benchmarking with Malik Management®, under licence, for strategy and organisational transformation.

Check whether PIMS fits your question.

Request the data sheet, or a sample extract under NDA. We will take you through coverage, variables and access options.